Properties Not Eligible For Equity Release
Some properties can’t qualify for equity release because of risks or restrictions, such as structural problems or legal issues. Take a look at the different property types and restrictions to find out if yours might be affected.
Leasehold properties
Leasehold properties can pose challenges for equity release because the homeowner only owns the property for the duration of the lease, while a freeholder owns the land.
This arrangement introduces several complications for both homeowners and equity release providers.
Read on to find out the reasons why.
Short lease terms
The length of the lease has a significant impact on a property’s value. Equity release providers prefer properties with long lease terms, usually over 80 years.
If the lease term is shorter, especially below 60 years, the property becomes less valuable because a short lease can make the property difficult to sell.
The closer the lease is to expiry, the more costly it becomes to extend it, especially when it falls below 80 years, triggering marriage value (a premium the freeholder can charge).
The high cost of extending a lease can reduce the immediate equity available to the homeowner.
Ground rent & service charges
Leasehold properties often require homeowners to pay ground rent to the freeholder and service charges for maintaining communal areas or the building.
These ongoing costs can make the property less attractive to equity release providers, as they reduce the homeowner’s disposable income and lower the amount of equity that can be released.
The provider may also view these regular payments as reducing the property’s appeal in the market, affecting its future resale value.
Alteration restrictions
Lease agreements often include clauses that limit the homeowner’s ability to make significant changes or improvements to the property without the freeholder’s consent.
For example, adding an extension, converting the loft, or making structural changes may require costly permissions or be prohibited entirely.
These restrictions prevent homeowners from enhancing the value of the property, which in turn reduces the amount of equity that can be released through an equity release plan.
Lenders may see this as limiting the property’s future value growth.
Subletting restrictions
Many leasehold agreements contain strict rules against subletting or require permission from the freeholder to do so.
This limits the homeowner’s ability to generate rental income, which could have improved affordability or provided additional funds to supplement an equity release plan.
Without this flexibility, the homeowner’s financial situation may be less stable, and the property may be less attractive to lenders because of the reduced income potential.
While some equity release providers accept leasehold properties, the terms can vary significantly depending on the lease length and other factors such as ground rent, service charges, and any restrictions in the lease agreement.
In some cases, providers may require that homeowners extend the lease, which can be costly, before approving an equity release plan.
Therefore, homeowners with leasehold properties must consult a financial adviser to understand their eligibility and options.
Properties with structural issues
Properties with structural issues are often unsuitable for equity release because of the heightened risk they pose to lenders.
Structural problems such as subsidence, cracks in the foundation, or roof damage can significantly reduce a property’s value and make it difficult to sell, leading to the following challenges.
Risk to providers
Structural damage complicates accurately valuing the property. Issues like subsidence or foundation damage can worsen over time, making the property increasingly unstable and more challenging to market.
Lenders face a higher risk if the property cannot be sold for a value that covers the loan, particularly if expensive repairs are needed before any sale occurs.
Reduced value
The cost of structural repairs, such as underpinning the foundation or replacing a roof, can be substantial.
For homeowners, these costs diminish the amount of equity available to release, as lenders will factor in the expense and risk of repairs when determining how much can be borrowed.
Significant structural issues may also require the homeowner to vacate the property while repairs are made, disrupting their living situation and possibly adding to financial burdens.
As a result, many equity release providers are reluctant to approve plans on properties with unresolved structural problems, as the risk of losing money on the investment is too high.
Holiday homes
Equity release requires the property to be the homeowner’s primary residence, excluding holiday homes from eligibility.
Listed properties
Listed properties may face difficulties in qualifying for equity release due to several challenges.
Alteration restrictions
Listed properties are subject to strict renovations, repairs, and upgrade regulations.
These restrictions are designed to preserve the property’s historical or architectural integrity, but they limit what changes can be made.
Homeowners may need special permissions (listed building consent) for even minor repairs, and unauthorised changes can result in legal penalties.
This lack of flexibility in enhancing or modernising the property can negatively impact its market value, as buyers may be discouraged by the difficulty and cost of maintaining such a home.
Valuation challenges
Determining the value of a listed property can be more complicated than with standard homes.
Listed buildings often have unique features, materials, and historical significance, making traditional valuation methods less applicable.
The property’s value may fluctuate depending on its condition, historical importance, or location.
Moreover, the cost of maintaining or restoring a listed property can be high, which adds additional complexity to the valuation process and may result in a lower equity release offer.
Limited market appeal
The specialised nature of listed properties often means they appeal to a niche market.
Potential buyers may be put off by the high maintenance costs, legal modification restrictions, or the responsibilities of owning a historically significant home.
This smaller buyer pool can make it harder to sell the property quickly, increasing the risk for equity release providers.
If a property is difficult to sell or requires significant upkeep, lenders may hesitate to offer equity release, fearing that the resale value won’t cover the loan amount.
Due to these factors, homeowners with listed properties may find fewer equity release options and should carefully consider the potential challenges before proceeding.
Shared ownership properties
Due to several significant complications, shared ownership properties are typically not accepted for equity release.
Partial ownership
In a shared ownership arrangement, the homeowner only owns a portion of the property, with the remaining share owned by a third party, usually a housing association.
This partial ownership means that the homeowner does not have complete control over the property.
Equity release generally requires full ownership of the property to ensure that the lender has an explicit right to recoup the loan from the property’s value in the future.
Limited control
With shared ownership, the homeowner has restricted control over the decision-making process regarding the property, mainly when selling or making significant changes.
The housing association or third-party owner may need to approve any modifications or sales, adding layers of complexity that reduce the property’s attractiveness for equity release providers.
This lack of autonomy can create legal and financial hurdles, making it harder for lenders to secure their investments.
Valuation challenges
Accurately valuing a shared ownership property is much more complex than with wholly owned homes.
The market value must account for the homeowner’s portion and the third party’s share, and any appreciation or depreciation can be more challenging to assess.
Moreover, shared ownership properties often restrict who can buy the remaining share, limiting the potential buyer pool and impacting the property’s resale value.
This makes it riskier for equity release providers, as they may be unable to recover the total loan amount if the property is sold.
Non-standard construction properties
Non-standard construction properties refer to homes built using materials or methods that differ from traditional brick or stone construction.
These properties often face challenges in qualifying for equity release due to the following factors.
Structural risks
Non-standard construction materials, such as timber frames, steel frames, concrete panels, or prefabricated units, can be more prone to deterioration or damage over time.
For example, older concrete panel homes may suffer from structural weakness due to concrete degradation, and timber-framed houses can be more vulnerable to rot or pest infestations.
These risks increase the likelihood of expensive repairs, making the property a less secure investment for equity release providers.
Valuation difficulty
Properties built using non-traditional materials are harder to value accurately, as they may not have a clear resale precedent in the market.
Lenders struggle to assess these properties’ long-term durability and market demand, especially if the construction type has fallen out of favour or is considered experimental.
For example, homes built with steel or aluminium frames, once popular in the post-war era, may now be regarded as outdated, and the need for specialised inspections often complicates their valuation.
Limited market appeal
Non-standard construction properties may appeal to fewer buyers, mainly if they are considered higher maintenance or less reliable than traditional homes.
This limited demand affects the resale value, a critical factor for equity release providers, as they need confidence in the property’s marketability.
For instance, prefabricated homes or those using experimental methods like straw bale construction may have niche appeal but lack broad market acceptance, making them harder to sell in the event of foreclosure.
Due to these combined risks, equity release providers often hesitate to approve loans on properties built with non-standard materials, as they represent a higher risk for both valuation and resale.
Mobile homes
Mobile homes are typically unsuitable for equity release because they are not considered permanent structures.
As they are often constructed with lighter materials and can be relocated, they don’t meet the criteria of a traditional property.
Moreover, many mobile homes are situated on leased land, which further reduces their value in the eyes of lenders.
The lack of ownership of the land can complicate legal arrangements, making it riskier for providers to secure a loan against the property.
Additionally, unlike traditional brick-and-mortar homes, mobile homes tend to depreciate rather than appreciate, reducing their attractiveness for equity release.
Properties with usage restrictions
Properties subject to planning or usage restrictions are often disqualified from equity release due to the limitations these restrictions place on development and resale potential.
Lenders are cautious about properties that may face difficulty increasing in value or finding a buyer.
Below are the key types of usage restrictions that impact equity release eligibility:
Conservation areas
Properties located in conservation areas are subject to stringent regulations designed to preserve the area’s historical or architectural character.
These rules often restrict homeowners from making alterations, such as extensions or modernising the exterior.
The inability to make value-enhancing modifications reduces the property’s future resale value, making it less appealing to equity release providers.
Floodplains
Homes on floodplains are considered high-risk due to the potential for flood damage.
This risk makes the property more difficult to insure and increases the likelihood of costly repairs.
Also, homes in flood-prone areas are less attractive to potential buyers, lowering their resale value.
These factors lead lenders to view such properties as higher-risk investments, making equity release less likely.
Agricultural ties
Properties with agricultural ties are restricted to individuals working in agriculture or related industries.
This significantly limits the number of potential buyers, as only those who meet the occupation criteria can purchase the property.
As a result, the property’s resale potential is diminished, making it less attractive for equity release providers, who rely on the property’s marketability to recoup the loan.
Environmental hazards
Homes located near environmental hazards are often unsuitable for equity release because these hazards can negatively impact the property’s value and the health of its occupants.
Lenders are cautious when properties are situated where resale potential is reduced due to such risks.
Here are some examples of environmental hazards and their effects:
Landfills
Properties near landfills can be affected by unpleasant odours, noise, and even potential contamination from waste.
These issues make the property less desirable to buyers, significantly reducing its market value.
The proximity to a landfill may also raise concerns about long-term environmental and health risks, further deterring future buyers, which makes the property a high-risk investment for equity release providers.
Power lines
Homes located near high-voltage power lines are often viewed as less desirable due to concerns about potential health risks from electromagnetic fields.
While the scientific evidence on this is debated, the perception alone can reduce buyer interest and lower property values.
The difficulty in selling such properties makes equity release providers hesitant to approve them.
Industrial facilities
Properties near industrial plants or factories may be exposed to noise, pollution, or hazardous materials.
These conditions affect homeowners’ quality of life and limit the property’s appeal to potential buyers.
The risks of environmental pollution and noise from industrial activities further decrease the property’s value and make it a less secure option for equity release.
Due to the significant impact that environmental hazards have on a property’s marketability and long-term value, equity release providers are often reluctant to offer loans on homes in these areas.
Solar panels
Leased solar panels can complicate the equity release process for the following reasons.
Impact on value
Potential buyers may see a home with leased solar panels as less desirable because they would have to assume responsibility for the lease.
This can create reluctance among buyers who may not want to inherit the ongoing financial commitment or maintenance obligations.
As a result, the property’s market value can be reduced, lowering the amount of equity that can be released.
Furthermore, some buyers may perceive the leased panels as a liability rather than an asset, especially if the lease terms are unfavourable or long-term, affecting the property’s attractiveness and resale potential.
Lender restrictions
Many equity release providers view leased solar panels as an additional risk, primarily because a third party (the leasing company) technically owns the panels.
Some lenders may outright refuse to approve equity release plans on properties with leased panels, as the presence of a third-party lease can complicate ownership rights.
Lenders accepting such properties may impose additional conditions, such as requiring the homeowner to buy out the lease before proceeding or transferring the lease obligations to future buyers.
Leased solar panels are often considered a complicating factor in equity release due to the potential financial and legal complications they introduce.
Therefore, it is essential for homeowners to carefully review the terms of their solar panel lease before pursuing equity release.
Find an adviser
Find a qualified and regulated equity release adviser using the Equity Release Council's register.
How much can you release?
You can usually release a minimum of £10,000, but the maximum amount varies based on several factors, such as your property's value and your age.
Typically, the older you are, the more you can release.
Are you looking for a quote?
While we do not provide a quote or call-back service as our website is purely informational, we understand that some people do want an equity release quote.
Get Started
To find out how to get the best equity release quote read our guide
